The Covid-19, Great Reset, Bird Flu and Climate Change Years of Fear Agenda

  The PCR test is not only useless in diagnosing the 'virus', it can be highly dangerous. It's a great way to collect DNA samples though. 

  Reducing fertility is not just about women's biological bits. And the Pfizer shot seems to be taking care of the male angle...

The 'independent' 'fact checkers' (we can't check our own facts any more - we must defer to the Ministry of Truth) have many dubious links to the likes of Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson. They also have unqualified people, spouting agenda-following tripe. And as for the mainstream media - well it's rolling in the money from the likes of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This is a great video - highly illuminating!

  Sunday Times best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman, looks at the omicron fraud (a fraud upon a fraud), eviscerates the fact checkers and thinks of ways to cheer himself up. https://www.vernoncoleman.org https://www.astandinthepark.org https://www.thelightpaper.co.uk

  Ex-Pfizer vice president, the English doctor Mike Yeadon, with facts and warnings. Listen? Don't listen? Want to be informed? Want to believe the big pharma/WEF/WHO/UN agenda? It's up to you. We strongly advise that you listen, disregard the highly dubious 'fact checkers' and make up your own mind.

    The American FDA is rubber stamping fake information so that the Pfizer 'jab' can be administered to 5-11 year old children. The long term safety trials will be done 'subsequent to roll-out'.  There is no risk to children from this fake virus. If you dissect the statistics and examine the PCR test the whole thing becomes idiotic anyway.  Suffer the little children... Stew Peters, October 25, 2021 The FDA is set to OK Pfizer's Death Shot for KIDS 5-11 Y/O, and Fauci's investments in modern-day communism and genocide are about to pay off, unless it's stopped. #ARRESTFAUCI Stew Peters talks to Dr Jane Ruby.

Ah, 'Fact Checkers'! Yep, we can't listen to people who are actually 'on the ground' and make our own judgements, no, everything has to go through 'Fact Checkers'. Then a sheaf of pro-agenda propaganda is issued, usually totally nonsensical to any person with a hint of reason, that everybody is supposed to accept. Because truth isn't truth and we can't discover facts for ourselves and the Fact Checkers are one of the gods of the 'New Normal'. James O'Keefe, post Jodi O'Malley's videos and testimony to Project Veritas, issues a stern warning to Daniel Funke of USA Today . Daniel Funke is a 'Fact Checker'. James is a true journalist.

BV? Before vaccines. AV? After vaccines. Oddly enough more people are dying this year, AV than last year, BV. Listen to Paul Weston. The mainstream media suppresses the facts, the 'Fact Checkers' lie - including the BBC, of course, Beastly Boris, Weird Whitty and Jabbing Sajid ignore, but the truth is here. Paul Weston reviews the facts and issues a challenge to the 'Fact Checkers'. 'UK' Government data on "covid deaths" and tests here ---> ⁣ https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths

    Of course, in my younger years we didn't have the World Wide Web, and one either got their news from the TV/radio, or bought a regular newspaper which backed one's political views - or both.  People also argued a lot, researched a lot and took differing viewpoints. Nowadays, we're all supposed to trust something called 'Fact Checkers'. Independent Fact Checkers, apparently.  But why do these organisations exist?  Why can't we check our own facts? If everything is honest and above board, where's the harm?  Why are governments and people like Bill Gates so 'in' with fact checkers? Who sponsors them? What are the qualifications for these fact checkers? Why are we supposed to believe their version of the truth - which simply backs organisations like the WHO, the WEF, the UN and world governments - and is often totally untrue?  Interesting little video above.

Well, they do. The Nuremberg Code was put in place to protect people after the atrocities of World War 2. We should not be coerced into taking experimental treatments. And that's just what the 'vaccines' (once again, 'jabs' or 'gene therapy' are far more appropriate) are. Fact Checkers? I don't understand why people cannot be allowed to question and investigate on their own behalf. Fact Checkers have a ghastly agenda - back the unproven/disproven (and extremely dubious) case for lockdowns, jabs, etc. Do your own investigations. The control being exercised here is terrifying. Tim Truth delves.

I've always checked my own facts. Call me quaint, but I've been doing it since the 1970s, when there was no World Wide Web (invented 1989, up and running early 1990s) and I will continue to do so.  Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, the man who was fundamental in stopping the covid scenario being enacted in the swine flu era, has been called a liar by 'Fact Checkers' - and this is now the subject of legal action. The Fact Checkers do not need to have checked their facts - they simply promote the agenda - and funding is a sticky issue. Facebook has joined the censorship era with gusto - but its 'independent fact checkers' - factcheck.org - are funded hugely by Johnson and Johnson! Can you believe it? Don't trust your own reasoning faculties - trust an organisation which is being funded by Big Pharma! As we've said before, the covid nonsense isn't some hugely clever scam. It doesn't need to be. It just needs people to be blindly fearful and compliant. Anybody can...

I'd never trust a fact checker. Whether I agree or disagree with their findings, I like to check my own facts, thank you. I've been doing it since the 1970s and will continue to do so. The likes of the Facebook fact checkers are simply liars, as are so many, when it comes to most things to do with the 'virus'. But who is behind them? Who provides much of the funding? And who is found to be an absolutely wonderful being by multiple fact checkers? It couldn't be a certain Bill Gates, could it? Listen to Ben Swann. You probably won't be surprised by the answer.