Showing posts from November, 2020

Liverpool And The Lateral Flow Test

The Great Reset - openly on display in England and Wales - and in the rantings of Boris Johnson. It's mantra? 'Build Back Better'. Its true purpose? To control humanity while placing all power and property in the hands of the 1%. It starts by putting the vast majority out of work, and 'universal income' - a pittance from world governments - which you will receive if you behave strictly as they want you to. So the media sits on the information that a far more reliable test than the PCR is producing astounding results in Liverpool. Covid? Well, listen to Paul Weston via the link at the bottom of this post and see. As for the Great Reset - it's real, folks. There's even a dedicated website from its co-originators, the Word Economic Forum (courtesy of the UN's 'Agenda 21'/'Agenda 2030'), and it's appearing on posters in England and Wales. Yep, the lockdown really reduced carbon emissions! 'Let's keep it up', says the small pri

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Wikipedia and the Truth about the Coronavirus

  “The time has come for homo sapiens to stand up and start becoming humans again. This scare, this global panic has caused man to lose reason, to stop thinking and to follow the Piper’s call, and we are being led to our downfall. This is the downfall of civilization …"  The dreadful Wikipedia operation, which is a major scandal to be quite frank, describes Professor Bhakdi thus: "...  a prominent exponent of ideas about coronavirus pandemic that ran counter to the agreed science." Um, the 'science' is far from 'agreed'. This 'virus' is being treated counter to all other viruses, masks are being worn counter to controlled studies, and many highly trained professionals are speaking out against it. Ever heard of the Great Barrington Declaration? - But, what do we expect from Wikipedia? The current agenda amounts to murder. The PCR test is unreliable when used in this context, and people suffering from really threatening i

James Corbett On Lockdowns - The Biggest Killers Of All - And Those Who Advocate For And Support Them...

In 2006, a 15-year-old high school student from Albuquerque, New Mexico won third place in the Intel science and engineering fair for her project on slowing the spread of an infectious pathogen during a pandemic emergency. Using a computer simulation that she developed with the help of her father, she argued that in order to slow the spread of the disease, governments should implement school shutdowns, keep kids at home and enforce social distancing.   Incredibly, that third place high school science fair project can be tied directly to the lockdown policies being implemented by governments around the world today. You see, that father that she developed her computer simulation with was no average doting dad, but a senior researcher at Sandia National Laboratories who at that time was working on pandemic emergency response plans for the US Department of Homeland Security .  His proposal to implement school shutdowns and, if need be, workplace shutdowns in the event of a pandemic emergen

The Intellectual Quarter... Lockdowns, Matt Hancock, Klaus Schwab and the Silence of the Sheep...

  Your leader - Klaus Schwab, of the World Economic Forum. The plan? Hinge onto a crisis - let's call it 'Climate Change' and try and ram through an agenda which will depopulate the planet and control the remaining plebs via surveillance in 'smart growth'/'New Green Deal' developments. Use the environment to cover your goals. Not working fast enough? Well, terrify the world population with a not-terribly-dangerous virus, kill people with neglect, cook the stats, crash the economy and then... Cambridge in England is supposedly a bastion of intellectual brilliance, with its ancient university. I was just looking around the Web for updates for this blog, and came across the headline: 'More Than 500 New Cases of Covid in Cambridgeshire in 24 Hours'. Of course, this means positive PCR tests, with all the attendant potential for false positives. The end of the article contained the 'stats' for those who had died within 28 days of a positive PCR tes